top of page
SOSCA Letter Template Header-01.jpg


WHY YOUR DRINKING WATER IS AT RISK

THE FULL STORY
 

THE SOUTHERN WATER ‘HWTWR’ PLANS WILL ADD TREATED EFFLUENT FROM

THEIR BUDDS FARM SEWAGE WORKS INTO THE NEW THICKET RESERVOIR.

 

Wetter winters = more FREE rain

Collecting FREE rain = MORE drinking water

Southern Water and Private Equity
In 2022, Southern Water—then majority owned by Macquarie Asset Management—entered a joint partnership with Portsmouth Water, offering to fund their new £340 million spring fed reservoir - subject to certain conditions. These included mandatory water transfers to Southern Water from 2030/31 and the recycling of final effluent from Budds Farm sewage works into the reservoir from 2034. The scheme was rebranded as the Hampshire Water Transfer and Water Recycling Scheme and designated a Nationally Important Significant Infrastructure Project, (NISIP) limiting local authority and public challenge.

 

There are many concerns such as the following:

Environmental Impacts
  • This process is new to the UK
  • It has a strong potential to contaminate our future drinking water.
  • It requires the opening of an un-monitored,  un-engineered land fill site adjacent to the much protected Langstone Harbour (SPA, Ramsar, SSSI and others).
  • No robust Habitats Regulation Assessment.
  • Untreated ‘Forever chemicals’ could contaminate the new reservoir in perpetuity.
  •  The three sites for recycling plants will have four times the concentration discharges into the Solent including forever chemicals and pharmaceuticals.  
  • There is a risk that the beaches along the east coast of the Isle of Wight, and along Hayling and Witterings will be under threat, a threat not only to humans but to marine life.
  • Piping will need to be installed across the South Downs National Park > READ MORE
  • The new effluent recycling plant to the Pulborough Hardam WWTworks  will discharge greater concentrations into the River Rother which will then flow into the River Arun.
 
Construction Impacts
  • Building a four story factory requires opening the Broadmarsh landfill site which will increase the leaching of chemicals and pollutants into the SSSI, SPA, Ramsar protected Langstone Harbour.
  • The project is only a drought resource. Yet the procedure requires the Southern Water to treat and pump more than 12 Olympic size swimming pools of water 40 km every day of the year- even when the water is not needed.
  •  Operations will break all of Southern Water’s company net zero commitment by 2030.
  • There is no commitment to monitor each and every piece of infrastructure on a daily basis.
  • The history of Southern Water’s commitment to high levels of maintenance is publicly concerning with a long history of repeated plant failure.
  •  Unlike the sustainable and forever asset of a new reservoir the planned life of the factory will require replacement every 40 years.
  • All three new factory sites of Budds Farm, Littlehampton and Sandown on the Isle of Wight are all situated within Category 3 of the Climate Change Flood Zones > READ MORE
  • None of these sites are expected to survive to 2100.
  • There has been no mentioned of flood proofing any of the pumping stations.
  • It is vital - due to the sensitivity of the reverse osmosis process - that the membranes are run 24 hours in order to ensure the plant operates at a ‘minimum flow’. Any stoppage is of great concern to the cost and integrity of the entire project.
 
Financial Implications
  • The English water companies are now mostly owned by private equity firms.
  • Their sole motivation is for short-term profits.
  • These include controversial tax avoidance strategies.
  • This has resulted in eye-watering levels of asset-stripping increasing the debt of all the water companies including Southern Water since 1990 to £52bn.
  • According to Ofwat water companies paid out £57bn in dividends since 1990.
  • These monies were shared out amongst other legal entities within the hedge fund conglomerates, some of which are registered in tax havens to avoid UK tax liabilities.
  • In addition to the Government’s 3.5% guaranteed investment return, the hedge fund owners can deduct the huge loan repayments from earnings to reduce reported profits – and therefore their tax bill > READ MORE
  • All of the above is dependent upon the taxpayer ie you - paying higher water bills.
 
Governance and Public Confidence
  • Despite failing to meet key criteria, Ofwat has allowed the scheme to pass Gates 2 and 3 of their Rapid monitoring procedure.  
  • This means customers are already funding development costs.
  • Public consultations were poorly publicised and demonstrably incomplete with many  of responses disregarded.
  • Trust in Southern Water is at an all-time low, raising serious concerns about the company’s ability to safely operate a complex potable reuse system that has not yet been proven at scale in the UK.
  • There have been several articles by academics that the water companies have been using meretricious statements about the efficacy and reliability of their infrastructure > READ MORE
  • This is about access to safe drinking water which is a ‘fundamental legally recognised human right essential for life, health, dignity and sustainable development’  UN
  • If public confidence in tap water collapses, reliance on bottled water would be environmentally catastrophic, 150,000 tonnes of CO₂ annually > READ MORE
  • Most SW and PW customers are NOT aware of SW’s plans for recycling effluent.
  • There has been no direct mailing to customers or information with bills.
  • Publicity for public consultations about the fundamental change of their water supply have been extremely poor. On 3rd November 2025 we learn that major Water Companies have been poisoning the drinking water of six million people because they have not reduced the level of ‘forever chemicals’ to an acceptable level. Drinking Water Inspectorate says ‘It could constitute a potential danger to human health’. 
  • Past experience has shown that Southern Water have not had a credible, operational or tested business resilience plan against systemic operational failure.
     
ALTERNATIVES
The UK is already experiencing higher rainfall due to climate change.  The country collects only about 1% of this free product.  It is a huge waste of a precious national resource.
Over the last five years Southern Water has only replaced 0.1% per annum of water mains. Southern Water has been losing around 100 million litres of water per day through leakage—approximately 22% of supply - with meaningful reductions not planned until 2050.
 
Immediate, lower-impact alternatives include:   
  • Moving abstraction from chalk streams such as the Itchen and Test, to the tidal limits.
  • Store excess winter water in confined aquifers.
  • Bring forward winter storage reservoir schemes such as planned for the River Adur scheme.
  • Reservoirs could be built eg: on the Isle of Wight, and closer to where the water is needed ie: Southampton.
  • Three reservoirs could be built the size of the Havant Thicket reservoir (cost £350 million) for the same price of £1.2 billion for the effluent recycling scheme.
  • A more ambitious effort to increase existing pipe infrastructure, and set more challenging targets for control of leakage.
These alternatives are environmentally sustainable which are being ignored because they do not come under the Government’s 3.5% guaranteed investment return for Southern Water - which would be the only way the company could continue to sustain its high salaries and ‘bonuses’. 

ACTION : HOW TO WRITE TO YOUR MP
REQUESTING SOME ANSWERS:

MAKE SURE TO ALWAYS QUOTE THE REFERENCE:

(fdWRMP24) HWTWR

SUGGESTED WAY TO BEGIN YOUR LETTER:

Dear                                  (MP),

 

RE: Southern Water's Hampshire Water Transfer and Water Recycling project - HWTWR (fdWRMP24) 

 

I am writing regarding Southern Water’s plan to use their recycled effluent from their Budds Farm Sewage plant to provide drinking water to their customers.)

 

 

These are some questions you could ask:

  • Why has there not been an open public debate BEFORE the decision to proceed with effluent recycling was made?
     

  • I am a Portsmouth/Southern Water customer paying not only my bills but am also a tax payer since this is a public utility.
     

  • Southern Water is a monopoly – I have no alternative choice.
     

  • I have been led to believe that the Havant Thicket new reservoir, about to be filled with spring fed water from local aquifers, will provide the future security during a drought.
     

  • I now have heard that this will no longer be the case that it might well become part of Southern Water’s recycling of effluent from their Budds Farm Sewage Treatment works, where the processing plant must run 24/7 regardless of variations in supply and demand.
     

  • Why have I not been informed of this change in the source of my drinking water? And where has this been discussed?
     

  • What will be in this recycled effluent?
     

  • Sewage recycling is environmentally damaging and very costly in chemicals, energy and manpower. 
     

  • Why have cheaper solutions such as leakage reduction (currently 20%), rain water storage, using aquifers and building new reservoirs.?
     

  • There is sufficient evidence in the public domain that the public have very little trust in the corporate integrity of Southern Water as a company and provider of a public utility.
     

  • There are too many incidents of maintenance failures and illegal sewage discharges. The reservoir could become polluted and its water integrity ruined forever- this could have a huge impact upon the health of all who use this end product.
     

  • What happens if everyone decides they no longer trust Southern Water and turns to bottled water?
     

  • Why has this not been discussed in Parliament if all of this is true?
     

  • Unlike countries already using sewage effluent we are not water poor but we currently waste and fail to store sufficient of the free winter supplies of rainwater.
     

  • Will forever pharmaceuticals and chemicals be removed before it reaches our taps?
     

  • I know what my tap water tastes like – will the new one taste the same?
     

  • Whilst the recycled effluent might be acceptable to the Drinking Water Inspectorate what is the criterion for managing all the new PFAS and for setting the standards? 
     

  • Why has there been no clear democratic decision over making recycled wastewater a routine part of the UK’s drinking water?
     

  • I am your constituent but I have not heard anything from you on this matter.
     

  • Why? Perhaps there should be a rebalancing and enforcement of civil rights such as
    - the Human rights to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment.

MP'S WHOSE CONSTITUENCIES WILL BE AFFECTED:

MP
CONSTITUENCY
EMAIL ADDRESS
Jess Brown-Fuller
Chichester
jess.brownfuller.mp@parliament.uk
Alex Brewer
NE Hampshire
alex.brewer.mp@parliament.uk
Dr.Beccy Cooper
Worthing West
beccy.cooper.mp@parliament.uk
Andrew Griffith
Arundel
andrew.griffith.mp@parliament.uk
Alison Griffiths
Bognor & Littlehampton
alison.griffiths.mp@parliament.uk
Damian Hinds
E Hampshire
damian.hinds.mp@parliament.uk
Paul Holmes
Hamble Valley
paul.holmes.mp@parliament.uk
Peter Lamb
Crawley
peter.lamb.mp@parliament.uk
Alan Mak
Havant
alan.mak.mp@parliament.uk
Amanda Martin
Portsmouth North
amanda.martin.mp@parliament.uk
Stephen Morgan
Portsmouth South
stephen.morgan.mp@parliament.uk
John Milne
Horsham
john.milne.mp@parliament.uk
Darren Paffey
Southampton Itchen
darren.paffey.mp@parliament.uk
Joe Robertson
Isle of Wight East
joe.robertson.mp@parliament.uk
Tom Rutland
E Worthing & Shoreham
tom.rutand.mp@parliament.uk
Richard Quigley
Isle of Wight West
richard.quigley.mp@parliament.uk
This scheme of creating recycling plants for Southern Water’s customers will be the first in the UK. They intend to use the Sandown site on the Isle of Wight as their test case.
If permission for this goes ahead then it will set a precedent and the rest will follow – this will mean that every water company in the country will turn to the recycling of sewage for drinking water for their customers rather than the building of sustainable reservoirs or catchment sites for the winter floods.
It is interesting that much of the Sandown plans were well advanced when SOSCA contacted communities across the Island earlier this year to ask their views but – NO ONE KNEW ABOUT IT.

SOSCA'S APPEAL

Please encourage as many people as possible to join SOSCA.

We can then send bulletins and news to them directly which will help them to voice their concerns to the right authorities. We would also welcome any ideas or contacts to help promote our cause.

 
There is no fee in joining.  We are all volunteers.

However, to help us help you it would be wonderful if you could all donate, no matter how small an amount, so that we can continue to challenge the government on your behalf.


THANK YOU
bottom of page